Online Backup Comparison: Sugarsync Vs Dropbox

Online Backup Comparison: Sugarsync Vs Dropbox

It’s not uncommon to find prospective cloud storage customers who shuffle through a long list of potential providers, only to arrive at the conclusion that either Dropbox or Sugarsync would be the best solution.

These providers are currently two of the most popular cloud storage providers on the market due in large part, to the reputation each has built. Any online backup service comparison would come to the conclusion that both of these products offer a variety of features at competitive prices.

Sync Outside the Box

Comparison of Sugarsync (Try It For Free) vs Dropbox

In order to effectively compare online backup services, it is important to focus solely on the differences and not waste time worrying about areas of similarity.

When comparing Dropbox vs Sugarsync (read our full Sugarsync Review here), there are certainly plenty of similarities, but there are also several material differences that set these two cloud storage providers apart. This online backup comparison will hopefully identify these differences and help prospective customers make the right choice.


Both of these providers support standard platforms. Sugarsync is unique in that it also supports the Symbian platform as well as Windows Phone and Samsung Smart TVs.

While Dropbox is not compatible with those platforms, they do have the advantage of supporting Kindle Fire and Linux.

File Sharing and Syncing

Both providers allow file sharing and file syncing with multiple devices. However, there are several different positive aspects to Sugarsync’s file-sharing and syncing methodologies that make it a better choice.

First, Sugarsync initiates file-sharing with permission options that allows the user to establish which functions they will permiot others to perform. Secondly, Dropbox only allows syncing of a designated folder, a “magic folder,” while Sugarsync actually allows for syncing with any file on the device.

This is a huge advantage for Sugarsync because the user isn’t required to reorganize their hard-drive to conform with any predetermined formats.

Simplicity of the Interface

Dropbox earns the nod here. There are very few features in Dropbox where the user needs to select a bunch of supporting options.

The user simply downloads the software with many of the features already set to go. With Sugarsync, most of the features come with options. While these options serve to make the overall experience a bit more complete, it also adds a layer of complexity.

File Versioning

There is a huge difference in this feature between these two providers.

Dropbox keeps an unlimited number of versions in history, but only for 30 days before the aged file is automatically deleted. If the user is willing to pay an additional $3.99 per month for Dropbox’s “PackRat” feature, the user is then able to store all history they want for an unlimited amount of time.

Sugarsync allows the user to accumulate up to five versions of any file for the life of the account. The best part is that only the most recent version counts towards the user’s storage space limitations.


Both provider use TLS (SSL 3.3) encryption for file transferring. Dropbox establishes itself as the more secure service by providing storage security with a 256-bit AES encryption format. Also, Dropbox is close to offering a remote wipe-out feature that will allow users to remotely delete backup files from devices that are lost or stolen.

Free Storage

The pricing models for both products are very similar. However, Sugarsync offer 5GB of free storage for the first 90 days to help users get started.

Dropbox offers only 2GB of free space, but for an unlimited amount of time. Also, Sugarsync offers a 30-day free trial period.


Both products offer a reliable solution with useful features. Dropbox is easier to use and a bit more secure. This will have appeal for novice users. More sophisticated users will be drawn to the extra functionality provided by Sugarsync’s more complex product. Either way, both products should be considered a very viable cloud storage solution in most situations.

Leave a Reply